• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

iBiology

Bringing the World's Best Biology to You

  • Start Here
    • Explore iBiology
    • All Playlists
    • All Speakers
    • All Talks
    • What’s new at iBiology?
  • Research Talks
    • Talks by Topic
      • Biochemistry
      • Bioengineering
      • Biophysics
      • Cell Biology
      • Development and Stem Cells
      • Ecology
      • Evolution
      • Genetics and Gene Regulation
      • Human Disease
      • Immunology
      • Microbiology
      • Neuroscience
      • Plant Biology
      • Techniques
      • Archive
    • Talks by Series
      • Bench to Bedside
      • Famous Discoveries
      • Great Unanswered Questions
      • Microscopy Series
      • Share Your Research Series
  • Stories
    • Background to Breakthrough
    • Interviews and Profiles
    • Science and Society
  • Courses
  • Careers
    • Professional Development Talks
    • Professional Development Courses
    • Career Exploration
    • NRMN Resources
    • Biomedical Workforce
  • Educators
  • About
    • Mission
    • Commitment to Inclusion
    • iBiology Team
    • Board of Directors
    • iBiology Funders and Partnerships
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
Home » Careers » Professional Development

How to Pick a Graduate Advisor

  • Duration: 15:08
  • Downloads
    • Hi-Res
    • Low-Res
  • Subtitles
    • English
  • Transcript

00:00:06.24 Hi, I'm Ben Barres,
00:00:08.12 my topic for today is how to pick
00:00:10.29 a graduate advisor.
00:00:12.01 So, I'm a professor of neurobiology
00:00:14.14 at Stanford University,
00:00:16.02 where I've had a lab for about the last 20 years
00:00:19.01 and where I've been lucky enough
00:00:21.04 in that lab to be not only doing
00:00:22.23 research, but also mentoring
00:00:25.03 terrific young scientists,
00:00:27.20 these are usually PhD students
00:00:30.03 and postdoctoral fellows.
00:00:32.10 And so, what I'd like to talk about today
00:00:35.04 is the importance of picking a graduate advisor
00:00:38.01 who's not only a good scientist, but
00:00:41.08 who's also a great mentor.
00:00:43.21 Now, the bottom line of what
00:00:45.22 I want to tell you is
00:00:47.10 that you want to do two things.
00:00:48.25 You want to pick a graduate advisor
00:00:50.05 who is an excellent scientist,
00:00:52.00 who is also a great mentor.
00:00:54.05 So let me take those in turn.
00:00:55.17 First of all, how can you, as a
00:00:57.29 beginning graduate student,
00:00:59.28 find an advisor who's an excellent scientist?
00:01:02.02 After all, the whole point of
00:01:04.07 doing a PhD is to learn how
00:01:06.07 to recognize and do great science.
00:01:08.03 And you're just a first year graduate student.
00:01:10.17 So, how are you going to be able to select
00:01:12.06 an advisor who's a great scientist?
00:01:14.09 Well, there are several different methods
00:01:17.19 that you can use, I suggest them all.
00:01:20.00 And I've listed some of them here.
00:01:21.23 But, picking an excellent scientist
00:01:24.13 is not sufficient.
00:01:25.17 You need to also pick
00:01:27.16 an advisor who's a great mentor.
00:01:29.20 Now that's a little trickier
00:01:31.14 to figure out, and this is the step
00:01:34.11 where many young scientists
00:01:35.26 sometimes are not as sophisticated
00:01:38.01 or mature in selecting their
00:01:40.13 advisor, and I think that this is something
00:01:44.19 that you need to think a lot about
00:01:47.18 in making your choice.
00:01:49.28 So, how can you tell whether your advisor
00:01:53.01 or potential advisor is also a good mentor?
00:01:56.15 Well, here's a few tips you can consider
00:01:59.14 trying. Very importantly, there's something called
00:02:02.21 the trainees list. Each advisor
00:02:05.02 prepares a list periodically for
00:02:08.20 NIH, in particular, submitted with
00:02:10.20 training grants that your department may use,
00:02:12.26 like the graduate PhD program, to help
00:02:15.04 fund the training program.
00:02:17.04 Each advisor periodically prepares
00:02:20.10 the list of all the trainees,
00:02:21.28 all the PhD students and postdocs
00:02:23.12 that have ever been in their lab
00:02:25.06 and then also on that list,
00:02:27.25 is what that previous trainee
00:02:30.07 is doing today. Do they have a lab
00:02:32.01 at a university? Are they a successful scientist
00:02:34.23 at a good pharmaceutical company?
00:02:37.10 Are they working still in science
00:02:40.04 in other great jobs, like being journal editors,
00:02:42.19 or working at NIH in the review process and so forth.
00:02:47.06 Many great jobs that scientists
00:02:49.11 can decide to take. You want to make sure that you're choosing
00:02:51.24 a mentor who is not only a good scientist
00:02:55.06 but is training their students to be successful
00:02:57.10 in their careers.
00:02:58.11 And taking a look at the trainees list
00:03:00.21 is a really good way to take a look at
00:03:02.10 over the advisor's career,
00:03:05.00 what percentage of their students
00:03:07.09 have gone on to be successful in science
00:03:10.10 and actually get the kind of job
00:03:13.29 that you aspire to get someday.
00:03:15.13 Now, it may be a little awkward to ask
00:03:18.16 your prospective mentor for a copy of
00:03:20.24 their trainees list, although I've
00:03:22.16 had students ask me for my trainees list
00:03:24.00 and I'm always delighted when they show the maturity
00:03:26.13 to ask for something like that.
00:03:28.15 But, you could also simply go to your PhD
00:03:30.28 department's headquarters office, the main office,
00:03:35.10 and ask for a copy of their most recent
00:03:38.19 training grant, and you will find
00:03:40.03 in that training grant, a list of the trainees
00:03:42.10 list for all of the potential advisors
00:03:46.09 that you may be considering.
00:03:47.22 So I would strongly suggest taking a look
00:03:49.14 at those trainees lists.
00:03:50.17 Next, you can also talk to,
00:03:54.01 once again, to senior scientists
00:03:55.22 who you know, including your
00:03:57.28 PhD program director,
00:03:59.07 about the training track record
00:04:02.12 of the advisors that you are considering.
00:04:04.16 If you're considering several different labs,
00:04:06.20 you might speak to senior scientists
00:04:08.22 and say, well, how does the
00:04:10.11 training track record compare
00:04:12.10 for each of those labs?
00:04:13.23 And then again, listen to what they're telling you.
00:04:16.01 You can actually even
00:04:20.22 Pubmed their trainees, and you can
00:04:22.12 figure out who their trainees are by
00:04:23.27 and large by looking at who have
00:04:26.00 been the first authors on papers
00:04:28.19 over the 10-20 years in their lab.
00:04:30.21 Then you can actually Pubmed those
00:04:32.18 authors and see now if they're
00:04:35.01 previous trainees have their own laboratories.
00:04:37.10 Are they actually doing great science
00:04:40.05 in their own laboratories?
00:04:41.20 So, by Pubmedding the previous trainees,
00:04:43.26 you can find out whether they're going on
00:04:46.08 track to be successful scientists.
00:04:48.19 And then most importantly, something that I
00:04:51.14 strongly advise you to always do
00:04:53.04 when you're considering joining a
00:04:55.14 lab of a particular scientist,
00:04:57.26 is to speak with some of their current
00:05:00.13 and past trainees. And then you
00:05:02.27 can ask these trainees what do they think
00:05:05.29 about that lab, is that a good lab?
00:05:08.04 Is good mentorship, in particular,
00:05:10.13 is good mentorship happening in that lab?
00:05:12.01 And here are some of the questions
00:05:13.17 on the next slide, that you can be asking them.
00:05:15.22 These are the sorts of things
00:05:18.23 that good mentors do and you
00:05:21.19 can ask their previous trainees
00:05:23.25 and assess, for example, as you do your rotation
00:05:26.13 in those perspective labs,
00:05:28.13 whether the mentor is going
00:05:30.08 to be doing these sorts of things.
00:05:32.01 And many, many things a good mentor
00:05:34.11 needs to do to help you,
00:05:36.07 keep in mind that when you do your PhD thesis
00:05:38.06 or your postdoc in a lab, this is essentially
00:05:41.09 a period of apprenticeship, where you're
00:05:43.00 going to be working very closely with
00:05:44.15 a senior scientist to learn how to
00:05:48.23 do research successfully yourself.
00:05:50.22 So there are many things that they're going to need
00:05:52.19 to teach you and therefore,
00:05:54.20 they're going to also need
00:05:56.27 to be able to spend a lot of time
00:05:58.05 with you. Well, one thing that a good mentor
00:06:02.03 does is help you to form good and tractable
00:06:05.04 questions. This may actually be the most
00:06:07.17 important that a good mentor does.
00:06:09.00 Because it's very hard as a young scientist --
00:06:11.13 after all, you're only going to have a few years,
00:06:13.25 to do your PhD. You need to have
00:06:17.07 a tractable starting point and
00:06:20.08 it takes a period of training before you learn to
00:06:22.25 recognize for yourself what's a good question
00:06:25.13 that's actually tractable in a several year
00:06:28.23 period of your PhD thesis.
00:06:30.25 Having picked a good question
00:06:34.22 to work on for your thesis,
00:06:36.12 next, you're going to need to talk to your mentor
00:06:38.25 about how to design good experiments.
00:06:40.19 What sort of experiments you should do.
00:06:42.06 You'll come up with some ideas yourself
00:06:44.10 but you'll need someone to toss them around with
00:06:45.24 and sort of suss out whether those are good ideas
00:06:49.08 or whether those experiments might be tweaked a little bit
00:06:52.08 to be even better.
00:06:53.16 A good mentor helps you to do that.
00:06:55.09 The best mentors also help you
00:06:57.16 to become increasingly independent.
00:06:59.11 over time. They may start by giving you some guidance
00:07:02.10 but as you build in confidence
00:07:04.13 independence, and knowledge, you'll be able
00:07:06.09 to increasingly come up with your own questions,
00:07:08.23 design your own experiments,
00:07:10.13 and so forth. And a great mentor will let you
00:07:13.04 do that. And very importantly
00:07:15.13 a great mentor does not micromanage
00:07:18.11 you, and by that I mean
00:07:20.11 a great mentor resists the ever present
00:07:23.19 temptation to tell you exactly
00:07:26.04 what experiments they think you should do.
00:07:28.08 Because, if you're always being told
00:07:30.04 what to do, number one, it won't
00:07:31.15 be as much fun, and number two,
00:07:34.04 you learn to develop your own instincts
00:07:36.14 about what is a good experiment.
00:07:38.28 And I could say here, that one of the most
00:07:41.29 fun things that I've found in running a lab
00:07:44.12 is talking to students and hearing
00:07:49.01 their ideas and seeing the sorts of interesting
00:07:51.06 experiments that they come up with.
00:07:53.28 Now, a great mentor very importantly
00:07:56.17 does not expect you to always be in the lab
00:07:58.26 slaving away every minute
00:08:00.18 over test tubes and so forth, doing
00:08:02.19 experiments. But understands that you need
00:08:05.08 to do some other activities that will often
00:08:07.19 enhance your training as a young scientist.
00:08:10.06 You need some teaching experience,
00:08:12.00 perhaps TA'ing in courses,
00:08:13.29 perhaps you'll take some summer courses
00:08:15.24 at Cold Springs Harbor or Woods Hole
00:08:17.13 or other places like that,
00:08:19.15 where you could learn more about science
00:08:21.00 in a different setting or in a different way
00:08:23.02 than you might be learning in your own lab.
00:08:24.29 And definitely, you need to be allowed
00:08:27.13 to attend conferences and present your work
00:08:29.11 and interact with other scientists.
00:08:31.22 And so, good mentors make sure
00:08:34.04 students have the time and the ability
00:08:36.08 to do those things.
00:08:37.23 Another thing that good mentors do
00:08:41.00 is that they create a very happy and interactive
00:08:43.01 and diverse lab environment.
00:08:45.08 And I mean diverse in all ways,
00:08:47.00 diverse in terms of gender
00:08:48.13 and race, but also knowledge and background
00:08:50.24 of the different people entering the lab.
00:08:53.06 And also creates a happy environment
00:08:55.11 where people are not directly competing with
00:08:57.03 each other, but rather, are teaching each other
00:08:59.06 and helping each other to be successful.
00:09:02.21 Another thing that good mentors do
00:09:05.19 that takes a lot of time is, they need
00:09:06.28 to spend you, teaching you
00:09:08.18 how to give a good talk,
00:09:10.04 how to write good papers,
00:09:11.24 how to prepare competitive grant applications,
00:09:14.08 review papers, and all the things
00:09:16.07 that you're going to need to do someday
00:09:18.06 when you're running a lab yourself.
00:09:20.24 And even after you finish
00:09:22.12 your PhD thesis in their lab,
00:09:24.14 a good mentor is going to support you
00:09:25.29 for the rest of your career
00:09:27.28 and help you to get opportunities as a young scientist,
00:09:30.11 to give talks at seminars,
00:09:32.11 to get grants. And all of these things
00:09:34.26 are things that a good mentor will do,
00:09:37.16 but it takes their time and it takes some
00:09:40.13 generosity on the mentor's part.
00:09:42.13 A good mentor really gives until it hurts.
00:09:45.28 And so, I think that this is a personality characteristic,
00:09:49.28 not all people are created equal in this regard.
00:09:52.00 There are very different styles of mentorship.
00:09:54.18 You want to look for a mentor
00:09:56.19 who is going to do all of these different things
00:09:59.10 to help you along your training as a PhD student.
00:10:05.03 Okay now, there are some things
00:10:07.01 I want to urge you to never to do.
00:10:08.21 And I've listed here three very common
00:10:10.28 mistakes that many first year graduate students
00:10:13.13 make in choosing a lab.
00:10:15.10 Don't make these mistakes!
00:10:16.16 Most important is number one,
00:10:18.29 I have found that universally,
00:10:21.09 and I was certainly no exception,
00:10:23.15 universally, students have this idea
00:10:26.20 when they enter graduate school about
00:10:28.23 some very specific research topic
00:10:32.01 that interests them and they cast
00:10:34.06 about looking for a lab
00:10:35.17 that works on this one little thing
00:10:37.08 that they want to work on.
00:10:39.21 Now, this is always a mistake.
00:10:41.26 Because that is not the way you should be
00:10:44.14 picking a lab. In any university
00:10:47.17 that you go to, there are going to be many great
00:10:49.08 mentors, but they may not all work on the one little thing
00:10:51.24 that you want to work on.
00:10:53.29 If you pick a good lab, if you
00:10:55.25 pick wisely, and you're mentored well,
00:10:58.01 you will get all of the skills and
00:11:01.04 abilities that you'll need so that someday when you
00:11:02.29 run your own lab, you'll be able to work on any topic
00:11:06.03 that happens to interest you.
00:11:07.23 Now, another mistake that I
00:11:10.25 would like to caution you about is
00:11:12.07 to never pick a lab just because
00:11:14.06 the PI is a Howard Hughes Investigator,
00:11:17.15 or is a Nobel prize winner,
00:11:19.28 or a National Academy of Science member.
00:11:21.28 All of these things are great indicators
00:11:24.13 that the lab or advisor you're considering is probably
00:11:27.22 a great scientist, but remember, being a great scientist
00:11:30.19 is not enough. You also want to make sure
00:11:33.05 that the lab is a lab with great mentoring.
00:11:36.27 And then lastly, and especially
00:11:39.00 I address this target to women,
00:11:40.16 never pick a lab because of the gender
00:11:43.02 of your advisor. I know that many
00:11:45.06 women in science are looking for mentors
00:11:47.11 as role models, and of course, this is very important
00:11:50.11 but that is not a sufficient reason to pick
00:11:53.17 a lab to do your PhD thesis.
00:11:56.26 First, make a list of labs where you
00:11:59.27 think the advisor is a great scientist
00:12:02.03 and a great mentor,
00:12:04.03 and if on that list, is a woman
00:12:06.23 and you have the desire to work in the lab of a woman,
00:12:09.05 by all means, then choose that lab.
00:12:11.23 But first, they must be a good advisor
00:12:13.18 and a good mentor. And most importantly,
00:12:17.14 maybe this is the most important thing I'm going to say
00:12:19.15 today, I think that doing science should
00:12:22.06 always, always feel like fun.
00:12:25.02 You should select a mentor who
00:12:28.03 has a sense of fun about science,
00:12:30.22 who's passionate about doing science,
00:12:32.09 passion about science radiates
00:12:34.11 from them when they talk to you about science.
00:12:36.27 One thing that always gets in the way
00:12:39.26 of having fun is if you have a mentor
00:12:41.26 who's telling you how many hours to work.
00:12:44.21 I've heard many stories where mentors are telling students
00:12:46.07 you should work 60 hours a week or something
00:12:49.12 like that. I have never in 20 years
00:12:52.01 ever told a student how many hours
00:12:54.15 to work. If somebody told me that, that would completely
00:12:57.07 take the fun out of it. I think
00:12:58.26 that all you can do as a mentor
00:13:00.10 is take good students into your lab,
00:13:02.17 give them opportunity, guide them gently,
00:13:05.28 and then the rest should come from them
00:13:09.16 and it should be a feeling of having fun.
00:13:13.13 Very importantly, doing great science
00:13:18.09 at any stage in your career should never
00:13:20.26 exclude having a life.
00:13:22.17 I have many students and postdocs in my lab
00:13:24.16 over the last 20 years, they've all
00:13:27.00 had active lives, many are married or have boyfriends or girlfriends,
00:13:30.15 have had babies while in my lab,
00:13:33.07 either PhD students or postdocs,
00:13:34.24 I've had multiple babies.
00:13:36.16 All these things are part of life
00:13:39.16 and there's nothing about doing science
00:13:42.00 that excludes having a great
00:13:44.03 life. If you're in a lab where the mentor
00:13:46.24 does not appreciate that, you are in
00:13:48.14 the wrong lab.
00:13:49.17 Most importantly, being in the right lab
00:13:53.10 should feel -- every day -- like being in summer camp.
00:13:56.07 When you wake up in the morning
00:13:57.24 you should feel like you can hardly wait to get out of bed
00:14:01.14 and go to lab. If you're in the right lab
00:14:03.18 it's going to feel like that.
00:14:05.19 Well okay, I've told you a lot of things
00:14:08.09 today about how to pick a good graduate
00:14:10.25 advisor. I've told you that you need to find
00:14:12.15 an advisor who's not only a great
00:14:13.26 scientist, but who's also a great
00:14:15.13 mentor. And you may be worried
00:14:18.11 that by the time you do all that,
00:14:20.14 that there may only be one person
00:14:22.03 in the entire university who fits that description.
00:14:23.12 Nothing could be further from the truth.
00:14:26.11 There are many great scientists who
00:14:28.14 are also great mentors
00:14:30.00 at every single major university in this country.
00:14:33.11 And every school has many great mentors,
00:14:37.17 your job, if you want to be a successful scientist,
00:14:41.05 is to pick one of them.
00:14:42.09 Thank you very much.

This Talk
Speaker: Ben Barres
Audience:
  • Student
  • Researcher
Recorded: June 2014
More Talks in Tips for Science Trainees
  • Live Q&A with Keith Yamamoto
    Live Q&A: Rethinking Graduate and Post-doctoral Training and Education
  • Enrique M. De La Cruz (Yale): How to Succeed in Science
    How to Succeed in Science
  • Bonnie Bassler
    Live Q&A: Tiny Conspiracies: Research on Quorum Sensing
All Talks in Tips for Science Trainees
Share

Talk Overview

Ben Barres gives advice on how to pick a graduate advisor. He strongly suggests picking an advisor who is not only a good scientist, but also a good mentor. In this talk, he describes a mentor’s qualities and attributes, and gives suggestions on how to identify an advisor who will be a good mentor.

Speaker Bio

Ben Barres

Ben Barres

Dr. Ben Barres is a professor at the Neuroscience department at Stanford School of Medicine. Barres earned his BA in biology from MIT, and completed a medical degree at Dartmouth Medical School. He continued his medical training as a neuroscience resident at Cornell University, completed his PhD in Neuroscience at Harvard Medical School, and joined… Continue Reading

More Talks in Professional Development

  • Susan McConnell
    Designing Effective Scientific Presentations
  • Rob Phillips (Cal Tech): A Vision for Quantitative Biology
    A Vision for Quantitative Biology
  • Keith Yamamoto (UCSF): Taking Risks
    Taking Risks in Science
  • Bruce Alberts
    Learning from Failure

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Sign up for the Science Communication Lab education newsletter

  • Sign up Newsletter
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Privacy Policy

Help us keep bringing the world’s best biology to you!

Footer

Funders

NSF
NIGMS
Lasker
Rita Allen

Start Here

  • Talks for Everyone
  • Talks for Students
  • Talks for Research
  • Talks for Educators

Explore

  • Explore
  • All Playlists
  • All Speakers
  • All Talks

Talks By Topic

  • Biochemistry
  • Bioengineering
  • Biophysics
  • Cell Biology
  • Development and Stem Cells
  • Ecology
  • Genetics and Gene Regulation
  • Human Disease
  • Immunology
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Plant Biology
  • Techniques

Talks by Series

  • Bench to Bedside
  • Famous Discoveries
  • Great Questions
  • Share Your Research Series

Career

  • Professional Development
  • Career Exploration
  • NRMN Resources
  • Biomedical Workforce

Courses

  • Microscopy Series
  • Short Microscopy Series
  • Open edX Courses
  • Cell Biology Flipped Course
  • Engineering Life Flipped Course
  • Evolution Flipped Course

Educator

  • Educator Registration
  • Educator Resources
  • Log In

About Us

  • About Us
  • iBiology Team
  • Wonder Collaborative
  • Contact Us
  • Mission
  • Privacy Policy
  • SCL Financial Conflict of Interest Policy

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences under Grant No. 2122350 and 1 R25 GM139147. Any opinion, finding, conclusion, or recommendation expressed in these videos are solely those of the speakers and do not necessarily represent the views of the Science Communication Lab/iBiology, the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, or other Science Communication Lab funders.

© 2023 - 2006 iBiology · All content under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 license · Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Usage Policy
 

Power by iBiology