• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Cell Adhesion, Signaling and Cancer

Transcript of Part 3: Focal Adhesions as Stress Sensors

00:00:03.08	Hello, my name is Mary Beckerle, and I am a professor of Biology
00:00:06.07	and oncological sciences at Huntsman Cancer Institute
00:00:09.28	and the University of Utah.  In this last segment,
00:00:13.07	I am going to talk with you about
00:00:14.19	some very interesting and exciting recent results from my laboratory,
00:00:19.08	in which we are trying to understand how cells sense and respond to mechanical cues.
00:00:25.14	We know that cells are really sensitive to a lot of different types of cues,
00:00:35.24	chemical cues, as well as mechanical cues, and what we are trying to understand
00:00:42.19	is how cells maintain a stable environment
00:00:48.01	and how organisms maintain a stable environment
00:00:49.21	in the face of all of this external simulation.
00:00:54.12	Now the concept of homeostasis, or maintaining a stable internal environment,
00:01:01.09	is one that physiologists have been aware of and have been working on
00:01:05.05	for many, many decades.
00:01:07.15	And basically there is in this concept of homeostasis
00:01:12.13	a model cassette for how a stimulus can impact
00:01:19.07	with a sensor and an effector pathway,
00:01:21.24	and then, via a combination of positive and negative feedback,
00:01:26.07	control the environment and maintain stability.
00:01:30.25	So how would this work when we are talking about
00:01:34.16	the exposure of cells and organisms to
00:01:37.19	significant mechanical stress? Well, we know that there are many
00:01:42.26	mechanosensitive organs in our body: bone, muscle, lung, the vasculature,
00:01:50.08	the heart. And if cells and organs don't respond
00:01:55.13	appropriately to mechanical signals, this can lead to very serious consequences
00:02:00.20	and serious disease. In the case of bone, for example,
00:02:05.06	which is a weight bearing organ, if there's not sufficient weight on the bones,
00:02:11.19	this can give rise to disuse osteoporosis.
00:02:15.01	In muscle, as illustrated schematically here,
00:02:19.21	there's a very, very dramatic response
00:02:22.22	to mechanical stimulation, where if muscle is exposed
00:02:27.29	to additional force or weight bearing, this can
00:02:33.14	give rise to significant hypertrophy or expansion of the muscle mass.
00:02:39.17	And in contrast, if muscle is not utilized due to
00:02:46.10	disease or disuse, it can atrophy. And one of the
00:02:51.02	ways in which both hypertrophy and atrophy happen
00:02:54.16	is by expansion of individual cells or the reduction in size of individual cells.
00:03:04.27	So how is it that muscle cells can respond to these mechanical
00:03:10.14	signals, communicate to the nucleus to either
00:03:16.00	activate programs of gene expression that lead to more muscle growth
00:03:19.05	or allow for a decrease in muscle mass when it is not required?
00:03:26.17	Similar response to mechanical stress is evident in the cardiovascular system.
00:03:32.26	Chronic high blood pressure is known to put an additional load on the heart.
00:03:39.01	And when that kind of condition exists,
00:03:43.02	you can see that you get this morphological
00:03:45.07	increase or hypertrophy of the heart.
00:03:48.27	And we now understand that this is not due to the
00:03:52.28	production of additional cardiac cells.
00:03:54.23	We are born with the number of cardiac muscle cells
00:03:57.07	that we are going to have when we die.
00:03:58.12	However, excessive mechanical load or enhanced mechanical load
00:04:03.19	causes the activation of cellular programs that lead to
00:04:09.04	expansion of the size of individual cardiac muscle cells,
00:04:13.27	and this ultimately leads to the expansion of the size of the heart.
00:04:17.17	So here you can see unstimulated or unstressed cardiomyocytes,
00:04:23.18	and here you can see corresponding cardiomyocytes
00:04:27.09	from a heart that has been put under stress.
00:04:32.11	And essentially what has happened here is that those muscle cells
00:04:35.17	are able to sense that increased mechanical load
00:04:39.24	and that signals them to activate and reactivate
00:04:43.12	the fetal program for gene expression
00:04:45.29	so that they build more contractile machinery.
00:04:49.01	This, of course, is initially adaptive and provides
00:04:52.06	for a mechanism by which the cardiac output
00:04:56.15	can be enhanced to compensate for the increased load on the heart,
00:05:03.16	but at some point it becomes maladaptive and leads to cardiomyopathy.
00:05:10.25	So where is the cell's stress sensor and how are these mechanical signals sensed,
00:05:19.11	and how are they responded to?
00:05:22.04	One of the really interesting ideas if you think about a cell
00:05:27.10	that is attached to the extracellular environment,
00:05:30.14	and we have, as we discussed before, these focal adhesions which are specialized
00:05:35.07	regions of the cell membrane that tether
00:05:37.28	the cell to the extracellular environment.
00:05:40.02	You can imagine that if this cell was being stretched,
00:05:43.25	that if you were pulling on this matrix here,
00:05:46.08	that these focal adhesions would really serve appropriately
00:05:50.01	as conduits for transmission
00:05:52.06	of that force or the signals that result
00:05:57.09	from that mechanical stimulation.
00:06:01.08	And so we were really interested in exploring this possibility:
00:06:05.29	first testing what is the normal cellular response to mechanical stretch?
00:06:12.28	One. And where does the stress sensor reside?
00:06:18.21	And three, what are some of the mechanisms by which cells compensate
00:06:23.28	and respond to these mechanical cues?
00:06:26.29	So with Masaaki Yoshigi, my bioengineering colleague,
00:06:31.18	who developed a very, very interesting stretch device,
00:06:36.21	we've taken cells and plated them on an elastic silicone
00:06:44.08	coverslip or sheet, and these cell can...these sheets are then clamped on
00:06:50.07	both ends, and we can expose these cells to cyclic stretch.
00:06:55.22	And we use 60 hertz and about 10 to 15% stretch.
00:07:01.16	And you can see that... this is my movie...
00:07:04.28	and you can see that you can stretch these cells,
00:07:10.07	and now we want to understand what are the consequences
00:07:12.07	of that stretch response.
00:07:15.09	So one of the first things that you see when you stretch cells in this way
00:07:20.28	is a really dramatic change in the actin cytoskeleton.
00:07:25.06	Here is an unstretched cell and you can see
00:07:28.13	the filamentous actin labeled with rhodamine phalloidin,
00:07:32.18	and you can see the actin stress fibers. However, if you stretch
00:07:36.09	these cells, and this particular cell was stretched, I believe, for one hour,
00:07:40.20	you see this really, really dramatic reinforcement of the actin cytoskeleton.
00:07:45.07	The stress fibers are much more robust, much more intense.
00:07:50.20	We developed a mechanism to actually quantitate the stress fiber thickness,
00:07:56.11	and when we do that we can see that even within thirty minutes of stretch
00:08:03.03	we get a really statistically significant enhancement
00:08:06.21	in the thickness of the actin filaments.
00:08:10.03	And this is sustained over a long period of time.
00:08:15.05	Another impact of cyclic uniaxial stretch on cells
00:08:23.27	is a re-orientation, and re-alignment of the actin cytoskeleton
00:08:28.12	perpendicular to the stretch vector.  And these are
00:08:31.28	fibroblasts that we are using, and different cells respond in different ways.
00:08:35.15	But very robustly in fibroblasts you start out with
00:08:40.20	unstretched cells that are randomly
00:08:42.21	oriented. And then over time, progressing to about eight hours,
00:08:48.16	you can see that the cells have now begun to align perpendicular
00:08:53.00	to the stretch vector.
00:08:54.01	And again we can quantify this change, and you can see
00:08:57.27	we go from randomly oriented cells with
00:09:03.00	cells oriented in all different directions to
00:09:06.22	a cell population where there is a very high probability that they are going
00:09:11.05	to be aligned perpendicular to the stretch vector within eight hours.
00:09:15.13	So what we see then is with these fibroblast cells we have two
00:09:21.21	really dramatic and consistent responses to mechanical stimulation.
00:09:26.08	We have a cytoskeletal reinforcement, and we have a
00:09:32.17	cytoskeletal re-orientation.
00:09:34.09	And it's really been very unclear how these are related to each other.
00:09:39.11	You could imagine that since the reinforcement occurs
00:09:42.06	on a more rapid time course
00:09:43.29	that it could be required prior to re-orientation,
00:09:48.23	or alternatively in this other model,
00:09:51.29	you could envision that mechanical force independently stimulates
00:09:55.09	these two responses and that they are mechanistically distinct.
00:10:00.21	So we wanted to try and address how
00:10:05.06	the cells are responding to these mechanical cues, and what kinds of
00:10:09.00	changes are happening within the cells that give rise to
00:10:12.13	this cytoskeletal reinforcement and re-orientation.
00:10:16.18	And again, we thought about how the cells are sitting on their
00:10:21.11	extracellular substratum, and essentially when we stretch that
00:10:25.02	silicone membrane, we are pulling on the places where
00:10:30.15	cells are tethered to the matrix, and these are
00:10:32.21	focal adhesions. So we thought it would be very interesting
00:10:35.19	to look and see whether any
00:10:38.10	focal adhesion constituents changed their distribution, or altered it
00:10:42.00	in any way in response to stretch in order to
00:10:44.17	give us some insight into some of the molecular events
00:10:47.16	that occur when cells are exposed to this type of mechanical stimulation.
00:10:52.03	And we really did a survey of a large, large number of focal adhesion
00:10:56.25	constituents to explore their distribution before and
00:11:01.03	after stretch, and I'll just show you two examples
00:11:06.10	here this morning. One is the protein vinculin
00:11:10.22	which is a focal adhesion constituent that does not change
00:11:13.24	its distribution in response to stretch, and then I'll show you
00:11:16.29	a second one, the protein zyxin, which I talked to you about extensively in part two
00:11:22.04	of this series, which is a focal adhesion constituent
00:11:25.27	which really responds quite dramatically and rapidly
00:11:29.13	to mechanical stress.  So here you can see
00:11:32.13	in the top two cells here an unstretched cell
00:11:37.22	that's been double labeled with antibodies
00:11:39.16	against vinculin on the left and zyxin over here on the right.
00:11:43.06	And you can see that these two proteins are nicely
00:11:46.26	co-localized at these focal adhesions. After stretch, you can
00:11:52.18	see that the vinculin is still found at these punctate
00:11:56.16	focal adhesions, but the zyxin is basically missing
00:12:00.21	from these focal adhesions and is now populating these long
00:12:03.18	actin stress fibers. And you can see that
00:12:07.27	these two proteins are behaving extremely differently
00:12:11.10	to the stretch stimulus in this overlay image
00:12:14.24	where in the unstretched cells you can see
00:12:19.06	the yellow merge indicating coincidence
00:12:21.21	of the zyxin and vinculin labeling,
00:12:23.25	showing that both proteins are prominently localized
00:12:27.04	at the focal adhesions, whereas in the stretched conditions you see red
00:12:32.09	here where the vinculin is remaining in the focal adhesions,
00:12:37.18	and the zyxin label has now traveled to a new distribution
00:12:41.24	in the cell to the stress fibers.
00:12:44.10	So this was a very, very striking observation
00:12:49.18	that really rapidly upon uniaxial cyclic stretch
00:12:53.21	there's a response within the focal adhesion
00:12:57.07	in which one of the constituents within the focal adhesion
00:13:00.04	rapidly is translocated from the focal adhesions to the actin stress fibers.
00:13:07.18	And we were very interested in this possibility.
00:13:12.11	It was the first example of a protein that was really
00:13:16.01	a mechanosensitive protein that responded in this dramatic way
00:13:21.07	to force, mechanical stimulation. And, as we discussed before,
00:13:27.08	this is the molecular architecture of the zyxin protein,
00:13:31.12	and we of course wanted to know now-we see this dramatic change
00:13:35.15	in zyxin's distribution-is the zyxin protein required
00:13:40.10	for any of the major morphological changes
00:13:43.26	that we see in response to stretch, either the actin reinforcement
00:13:47.17	or the re-orientation of the actin cytoskeleton.
00:13:51.22	So to address this question, we generated a zyxin null mouse,
00:13:57.13	and isolated mouse embryo fibroblasts that completely lack the zyxin protein
00:14:02.28	and then compared the behavior of those zyxin null cells with
00:14:08.03	wildtype cells that are stretched using this uniaxial cyclic stretch mechanism.
00:14:15.10	And here you can see on the left-hand side wildtype cells
00:14:19.25	unstretched and stretched, and just visually I think you can see how striking
00:14:24.23	it is that the cells are oriented in lots of different ways
00:14:28.14	prior to stretch, and then after stretch
00:14:31.12	they align perpendicular to the stretch vector,
00:14:33.21	and you can see this really quite dramatic reinforcement
00:14:37.23	or thickening of the actin stress fibers.
00:14:39.12	Over here in contrast, if we look at the zyxin null cells
00:14:43.21	you can see starting out that the cells are not aligned in any particular
00:14:48.18	way, and what you see after stretch is that they actually are aligned,
00:14:54.21	but you can see quite clearly that they have not
00:14:57.22	generated this really robust actin reinforcement response that
00:15:03.12	characterizes the response of the wildtype cells.
00:15:07.06	And we can see this quantitatively first down here
00:15:09.29	if we look at the alignment index you can see that there is no difference
00:15:14.01	really between the behavior of the wildtype cells and the zyxin null cells.
00:15:17.27	However, over here if we look at the actin
00:15:21.29	thickness index, you can see that the wildtype cells
00:15:27.08	in the closed circles really nicely reinforce their actin
00:15:32.13	cytoskeleton in response to stretch.
00:15:34.18	Whereas the zyxin null cells although they are re-aligning,
00:15:38.03	really don't dramatically increase the thickness of their actin filaments
00:15:41.18	in response to stretch.
00:15:44.29	So this told us really two very important things. First of all,
00:15:48.16	it told us that zyxin was required for the cytoskeletal reinforcement
00:15:56.12	that occurs in response to mechanical force,
00:15:59.04	and this was I think a very important new insight into
00:16:02.14	how cells respond to mechanical stimulation.
00:16:06.26	It also told us that zyxin was not responsible for cytoskeletal re-orientation,
00:16:13.16	and that then allowed us to distinguish between these two
00:16:18.19	possible models here and clearly illustrates
00:16:21.15	that re-orientation does not depend on reinforcement
00:16:25.11	and suggests that these two
00:16:29.09	responses are mechanistically distinct.
00:16:32.23	So thinking about...where is the sensor?
00:16:40.15	Obviously zyxin is at focal adhesions, so it seems reasonable to think
00:16:45.28	that the initial sensory device is housed within the focal adhesion
00:16:52.02	and one candidate for the molecular sensor,
00:16:56.13	or at least a molecule that really contributes
00:16:59.10	to the ability to sense these changes in mechanical stimulation
00:17:03.00	is the integrin adhesion receptor,
00:17:07.19	because clearly that is the transmembrane link between the
00:17:11.18	extracellular matrix and the actin cytoskeleton.
00:17:14.02	So it's positioned in sort of almost the perfect location
00:17:19.11	to be the conduit for sensing these mechanical changes.
00:17:23.10	So we looked to see whether or not integrin dependent
00:17:27.06	adhesion was required for the ability of zyxin
00:17:30.18	to move from the focal adhesions to
00:17:33.08	the actin cytoskeleton in response to stretch.
00:17:37.12	And the way we manipulated the adhesion of the cells
00:17:40.19	is to plate cells on polylysine, which allows the cells to spread, but they
00:17:45.21	do not require integrin dependent adhesion.
00:17:48.20	And here you can see that in unstretched cells plated on polylysine
00:17:53.06	you see zyxin in these concentrated adhesive structures,
00:17:57.29	and when we stretch these cells,
00:18:01.15	in contrast with cells plated on a fibronectin or collagen matrix
00:18:06.11	that engages the integrins,
00:18:08.12	where zyxin would move to the actin cytoskeleton, what we see is that the zyxin
00:18:11.28	protein really does not change its distribution in response to stretch.
00:18:17.27	So this experiment illustrated that zyxin depends on integrin
00:18:24.03	engagement in signaling in order to
00:18:25.29	sense the cues that are coming when
00:18:30.02	cells are exposed to mechanical stimulation.
00:18:33.03	So we see now that cells respond to mechanical stress by enhancing
00:18:40.03	their cytoskeletons, reinforcing their cytoskeletons
00:18:43.18	in a very dramatic way, and in a way that depends on integrin dependent adhesion
00:18:48.19	and the focal adhesion protein zyxin.
00:18:52.13	And we know that cytoskeletal reinforcement is actually really
00:18:59.21	regulated in general by the small GTPase Rho, which is
00:19:06.05	required for the ability of cells to build stress fibers. And so we were interested
00:19:10.18	in whether or not there was a role for Rho in this cytoskeletal
00:19:15.23	reinforcement process, or in the reorientation process,
00:19:20.11	but basically, what is the role of Rho in the response to mechanical stress?
00:19:24.09	And we tested this by exploring the impact of
00:19:28.11	inhibiting one of the downstream effectors of Rho, the Rho-kinase,
00:19:31.13	and analyzing how cells responded to mechanical stimulation
00:19:35.22	when Rho-kinase was inhibited.
00:19:37.25	And here you can see again on the top panel control cells
00:19:41.23	either exposed to...unstretched or exposed to stretch,
00:19:46.10	and once again, the very dramatic
00:19:48.22	reinforcement of the actin cytoskeleton
00:19:51.06	and realignment of the cells perpendicular
00:19:54.24	to the stretch vector.  And the surprising thing
00:19:57.26	that we observed when we inhibited the Rho signaling pathway, in particular
00:20:01.26	Rho-kinase, is that not unexpectedly, the unstretched cells
00:20:08.16	didn't have very robust actin cytoskeletons,
00:20:11.06	but surprisingly, when we stretched those cells they actually
00:20:15.18	responded many of them, by building these actin filament
00:20:21.14	bundles that interestingly were not oriented perpendicular to the stretch vector.
00:20:27.16	So these results I think were both striking and surprising.
00:20:32.23	And suggests that actually the Rho signaling pathway may be important for
00:20:38.09	the cell's ability to reorient the cytoskeleton in response to stretch
00:20:45.17	but does not appear to be critical
00:20:48.03	for the cytoskeletal reinforcement.
00:20:51.19	So what are the mechanisms by which the cytoskeletal reinforcement
00:20:57.04	might occur?  We see this thickening of the actin stress fibers.  This could occur
00:21:01.17	by recruitment of filamentous actin from the
00:21:05.29	cytosol into the actin stress fibers.
00:21:08.16	It could occur by increasing actin bundling along the
00:21:12.17	length of the stress fibers, stabilizing preexisting
00:21:16.29	actin filaments against depolymerization
00:21:20.08	or perhaps stimulation of de novo actin assembly
00:21:24.27	and polymerization.  And we wanted to explore this possibility
00:21:30.16	and assess which other factors might collaborate with zyxin
00:21:35.06	in this cytoskeletal reinforcement process.
00:21:38.02	And you may recall from part two of my presentation that I talked with you
00:21:44.24	about the fact that the zyxin protein has a structural and functional similarity
00:21:51.06	to the Listeria ActA protein which is critical for enabling actin
00:21:57.29	filament assembly on the surface of this intracellular
00:22:00.19	pathogen, Listeria. And zyxin in particular has
00:22:06.04	four of these ActA repeats which are proline rich
00:22:09.04	repeats which are responsible for docking Ena/VASP proteins which are
00:22:15.13	clearly implicated in the regulation of actin assembly and
00:22:18.29	which contribute to enhancement of actin assembly.
00:22:22.05	So as an initial step to explore whether or not Ena/VASP proteins
00:22:26.28	might be involved as well as zyxin
00:22:29.18	in this cytoskeletal reinforcement in response to mechanical stimulation,
00:22:34.18	we explored whether or not Ena/VASP proteins like
00:22:40.01	zyxin move from the focal adhesions to the actin cytoskeleton
00:22:44.12	in response to stretch.  So we first wanted to explore whether
00:22:49.13	or not the VASP protein responds to mechanical stress
00:22:53.16	by mobilizing from focal adhesions
00:22:56.22	to the actin stress fibers. And we did this by looking at wildtype cells,
00:23:04.08	and here you can see that VASP is normally localized
00:23:07.16	in focal adhesions of unstretched cells
00:23:10.10	where it's co-localized with the zyxin protein.
00:23:13.11	And then when you stretch those cells,
00:23:16.15	quite strikingly, and very similar to what we observed for zyxin,
00:23:20.00	the VASP protein moves to these actin filament arrays.
00:23:25.19	So like zyxin, VASP is mobilizing from focal adhesions to the actin stress fibers
00:23:30.22	very dramatically in response to this uniaxial cyclic stretch.
00:23:37.00	So since we know that zyxin interacts directly with VASP, we looked to see
00:23:43.09	whether or not this VASP redistribution
00:23:46.12	in response to stretch depends on the zyxin protein.
00:23:50.04	And so here we have examined the behavior of VASP
00:23:55.05	in zyxin null cells that have been
00:23:57.07	stretched. And what you can see is that already in the
00:24:01.19	unstretched cells VASP is absent from the focal adhesions
00:24:06.18	illustrating that VASP depends on zyxin to accumulate at these
00:24:11.21	focal adhesion sites. And likewise, after stretch, we don't see any accumulation
00:24:17.12	of VASP on the actin stress fibers in the zyxin null cells
00:24:22.03	compared to wildtype cells,
00:24:23.18	consistent with the idea that VASP really depends on zyxin
00:24:29.09	for both of these subcellular localizations.
00:24:32.13	Both localization to the focal adhesions in unstretched cells
00:24:36.02	and localization to the actin stress fibers in stretched cells.
00:24:41.04	And we can demonstrate this directly by re-introducing into the zyxin null cells
00:24:46.29	a GFP tagged zyxin, and under those conditions, we can see that VASP
00:24:54.09	now shows restored localization in the focal adhesions
00:24:59.05	and to the stress fibers upon stretch.
00:25:02.04	So clearly VASP is responding coordinately with zyxin
00:25:08.29	in response to stretch, and actually depends on the zyxin protein for its ability
00:25:16.05	to mobilize from focal adhesions to actin stress fibers in response to stretch.
00:25:22.13	A really interesting question that is not resolved
00:25:25.06	is whether or not the Ena/VASP proteins are absolutely essential
00:25:29.28	for this cytoskeletal reinforcement response.
00:25:33.01	And so we are hoping to approach that in two ways,
00:25:36.04	first to examine the response of Ena/VASP null cells
00:25:42.04	to uniaxial mechanical stretch and to see
00:25:46.08	whether or not these cells that lack Ena/VASP family members
00:25:50.10	will reinforce their actin cytoskeletons as wildtype cells do.
00:25:54.17	And secondly, since we have been able to show that we can reintroduce
00:25:58.03	a wildtype zyxin protein into zyxin null cells and reconstitute
00:26:04.08	a normal stretch response, we are developing mutated forms of zyxin
00:26:10.14	that lack functional ActA repeats.
00:26:13.15	And we will be able to reconstitute our zyxin null cells
00:26:16.11	with a zyxin molecule that is functional except for
00:26:20.21	its ability to interact with Ena/VASP family members
00:26:24.02	and explore in those cells whether or not the cells respond
00:26:29.03	appropriately to uniaxial cyclic stretch.
00:26:32.10	So in conclusion then what we have been able to show is that the zyxin protein
00:26:40.16	is really, really important for the cells' ability to respond to mechanical stimulation
00:26:49.00	and in particular, to reinforce
00:26:52.09	the actin cytoskeleton in response to a mechanical stress.
00:26:58.16	This mechanical stress activates these two very important responses:
00:27:03.29	the cytoskeletal reinforcement response and a reorientation response.
00:27:09.01	The integrin proteins and zyxin
00:27:12.11	are important in this cytoskeletal reinforcement pathway and likely
00:27:18.17	the Ena/VASP family members will be as well
00:27:21.10	because they facilitate zyxin's ability to stimulate and promote actin assembly.
00:27:27.25	And we've shown that they move with zyxin in a coordinated fashion
00:27:32.08	in response to mechanical force. Interestingly,
00:27:36.19	this second response to mechanical force, the cytoskeletal re-orientation
00:27:43.21	we were able to show is independent of zyxin
00:27:47.04	but rather seems to be dependent on the activity of Rho kinase.
00:27:52.28	And we believe that one of the things that is happening
00:27:56.16	is that zyxin and VASP are recruited to the actin cytoskeleton in response to
00:28:03.13	stretch and that allows, because of their properties
00:28:07.27	in inducing actin assembly, that allows for reinforcement
00:28:12.23	of these actin stress fibers.
00:28:14.28	There are many, many more questions that remain to be addressed here
00:28:20.11	in this extremely interesting
00:28:23.01	research area.  Again, I think that this
00:28:26.23	whole area of how cells respond to mechanical cues
00:28:30.07	is really a relatively new frontier in
00:28:32.19	cell biology that has important biomedical implications
00:28:36.25	since the inappropriate cellular and tissue response to stretch
00:28:46.18	or mechanical stress can lead to a variety of different types of
00:28:50.05	pathological situations. And we hope that
00:28:55.18	we are going to be able to understand more about exactly what
00:28:58.27	is happening in these situations by understanding what are the signals
00:29:03.03	that emanate from these integrin rich adhesions sites
00:29:07.16	to zyxin and its partners to stimulate their redistribution and
00:29:11.19	perhaps their change in activity, which leads to this important
00:29:15.27	cytoskeletal reinforcement response.
00:29:18.28	So again, we've got zyxin and its partners playing critical roles
00:29:24.19	in the cellular response to mechanical stress,
00:29:27.15	and I think these results really focus our attention on these
00:29:32.21	adhesion plaques, or focal adhesions,
00:29:35.06	as domains that are important domains in the ability to sense
00:29:40.21	mechanical cues, and really this leads me back
00:29:45.20	to one of my introductory comments
00:29:47.15	about homeostasis, and you begin to think about the ability
00:29:52.15	of cells to have tension homeostasis and maintain
00:29:56.29	a balance of force at these adhesion sites. Under normal
00:30:01.18	conditions you would imagine that there is a balance achieved with
00:30:05.27	the extracellular matrix and the actin stress fibers,
00:30:09.12	and if you actually pull on the extracellular matrix
00:30:16.17	or build up a lot more extracellular matrix which impinges on the cell
00:30:20.16	then the cell responds to that perhaps in a way that is similar to
00:30:24.10	what occurs with uniaxial cyclic stretch
00:30:26.29	by reinforcing the actin cytoskeleton.
00:30:30.06	And I think this is telling us that cells are really
00:30:33.18	able to sense this delicate balance
00:30:36.04	here and achieve a balance of forces
00:30:39.25	at these important sensory zones for the cell
00:30:44.10	So thank you very much, and
00:30:46.18	I look forward to being able to provide you an update on this
00:30:50.14	interesting research project in the future.

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences under Grant No. 2122350 and 1 R25 GM139147. Any opinion, finding, conclusion, or recommendation expressed in these videos are solely those of the speakers and do not necessarily represent the views of the Science Communication Lab/iBiology, the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, or other Science Communication Lab funders.

© 2023 - 2006 iBiology · All content under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 license · Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Usage Policy
 

Power by iBiology